Introduction
a)
Creature effects animation is a common feature
of contemporary movies, and a form of special effects widely used in two of the
highest-grossing film series of all time: Harry
Potter and Lord of the Rings.
b)
For this paper, I will focus specifically in the
characters of Dobby and Gollum as they are two very similar characters in their
appearance and actions.
Harry Potter
a)
Dobby created using a combination of computer
animation and models
1.
Stand-in actors or objects were used during
filming when Dobby would be computer generated
2.
Stand-ins were used for character placement, but
actions were not used for animation
b)
Many models used in the making of Harry Potter
creature effects
1.
Models used when a creature would be in a scene
with limited or no animation
I.
Full-body model of Dobby after being stabbed for Daniel Radcliffe to hold
II.
A full-scale robotic model of Buckbeak the
Hippogriff for Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
2.
Occasionally creature effects were a combination
of models and CGI in one shot
I.
Multiple versions of Dobby’s head were modeled
II.
The fire-breathing dragons in Harry Potter and the
Goblet of Fire – For the scene where the dragons were in cages, the heads were models
with built-in flame throwers and the rest of the bodies CGI
3.
I visited the Harry Potter Studios in London over
the summer and was able to tour the “creature lab” where the film models were on
display
I.
Including the real models of Dobby!
Lord of the Rings
a)
Gollum a combination of live action and computer
animation
1.
Motion Capture
b)
Andy Serkis played Gollum
1.
While the character we see on screen is
completely CGI, its movements are based on Serkis’ face and acting choices
2.
Gollum’s actions were a combination of
traditional animation and rotoscoping based on Serkis
I.
Rotoscope: When an actor’s motion is copied
frame-by-frame in animation, can potentially feel stiff and boring when not
paired with traditional animation
II.
Example: Jim Carrey’s A Christmas Carol
3.
Gollum’s voice is done by Serkis
c)
Animators “pushed” Serkis’ acting to better fit
the character
I.
This video with a side-by-side comparison of
Serkis acting and the final Gollum animation shows how the animators mostly
followed his movements and facial expressions, but in some cases added more
movement or exaggerated a motion
III.
This combination keeps Gollum feeling real
rather than like bad rotoscope
Comparison
a)
Each of these films is successful in their
character effects
1. Both films contain a multitude of characters that needed to be created with special effects and animation – films would not have been successful if they didn’t have an amazing special effects team
2. Dobby and Gollum are both extremely important characters to their respective plotlines and are characters that the audience really connects with
1. Both films contain a multitude of characters that needed to be created with special effects and animation – films would not have been successful if they didn’t have an amazing special effects team
2. Dobby and Gollum are both extremely important characters to their respective plotlines and are characters that the audience really connects with
I.
Connection to audience shows success of special
effects
II.
Entire theater cheers for Dobby's successes, such as his freedoom from servitude with the Malfoys, and cries over his death
No comments:
Post a Comment